Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Kyoto the Angel dann1@********.erols.com
Subject: Ansarok needs a lesson in Decking
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 1999 02:06:32 -0500
-----Original Message-----
From: Tamino <tamino@**********.wow.aust.com>
To: shadowrn@*********.org <shadowrn@*********.org>
Date: Thursday, March 04, 1999 11:25 PM
Subject: Re: Ansarok needs a lesson in Decking


>At 08:02 4/03/99 PST, you wrote:
>>Hey Ansalok, I didn't quite enjoy your message about deckers being
>>worthless PC's. You didn't really give any evidence to back up your
>>statement so I'm guessing that your one of these people who are to dence
>>to play deckers and can only handle Street Sam's. To continue, Decker's
>>are one of the most usufull PC's in Shadowrun. Aside from Rigger's (my
>>droned conterparts) do you know anyone else that can hack into a
>>security system of a corp, steal their funds and a lot of info from the
>>company and set the sentry guns to go off whenever a toilet is flushed
>>in 3 seconds and not get caught. Furthermore, it could just be that the
>>deckers in you campaign need to get their head out of their hoop hole.
>
>>Jack in Now-- Myth
>><<end memo>>
>
> Okay look...there is no need to get petty and start having a "deckers are
>better than everyone" contest, nor is there in reason to all jump on the
>poor guy because of one comment...everyone up till now had refrained from
>flaming him, instead providing reasonable intelligent reasons for why they
>thought/considered deckers to be valuable members of any team...so my
>advice is to please think before you post Myth, there is no excuse for poor
>manners.
>
>
>
>
If that guy is who I think it is, don't bother with trying to explain things
to him, he's one of those more....well Street Sam or Adept every time kinda
guy

Kyoto the Angel
AIM: AngelKyoto
ICQ: 29713335

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.