Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Gurth gurth@******.nl
Subject: Note to Mongoose
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 1999 11:56:55 +0100
According to Michael Berman, at 20:26 on 4 Mar 99, the word on
the street was...

> as much as this hurts to point out (and i know illget hell over this)
> but from my experience with deckers, they are absolutely worthless PC's
> the one in my irl campaign is either a bad player or a bad character and im
> not sure which

I have to disagree. Deckers _can_ be a poor choice of character, but
that's mainly because they do something mostly unrelated to the other PCs.
But much the same can be said about an astrally-projecting magician or a
drone rigger. After my last character got killed trying to wrestle with an
ant spirit, my current char is a decker who prefers to stay out of
trouble, but so far hasn't succeeded very well yet...

Anyway, to have a "good" decker character, IMHO you need a decker who
doesn't just sit at home and do shadowruns from there; what you want is a
decker who has more than one talent. Like a combat decker (fight & deck),
a negotiator-type (deck & haggle over fees), a decker with lots of
contacts (so the team can get a lot of info), or some other
decker/whatever combination.

--
Gurth@******.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
Hoera, we leven nog!
-> NERPS Project Leader * ShadowRN GridSec * Unofficial Shadowrun Guru <-
->The Plastic Warriors Page: http://shadowrun.html.com/plasticwarriors/<-
-> The New Character Mortuary: http://www.electricferret.com/mortuary/ <-

GC3.1: GAT/! d-(dpu) s:- !a>? C+(++)@ U P L E? W(++) N o? K- w+ O V? PS+
PE Y PGP- t(+) 5++ X++ R+++>$ tv+(++) b++@ DI? D+ G(++) e h! !r(---) y?
Incubated into the First Church of the Sqooshy Ball, 21-05-1998

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.