Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Paul Gettle RunnerPaul@*****.com
Subject: Heavy Armor
Date: Sat, 06 Mar 1999 23:12:02 -0500
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

At 02:33 PM 3/6/99 -0500, GMPax@***.com wrote:
>Another thought: Make the vehicles take standard damage from ALL
weapons
>(light = 1 box, moderate = 3 boxes, etc).
>
>Then multiply the BOXES of damage for the vehicle by some large
amount,
>perhaps based on the body of the vehicle. For example:
<<Snip Chart>>
>In this way, you still reflect the "cause any damage to a body 0
minidrone,
>and it is destroyed" ... 1 box of damage wrecks it totally. :-)
>
>However, for larger, high-body vehicles, say a decent truck with Body
4 or 5,
>and it would take TWO "deadly" level wounds to wreck it. In
_addition_ to the
>regular staging-down of non AV class weapons.

This also works well when used in conjunction with a house rule that
allows for damage levels past deadly. That way, large ammounts of
attacker successes, or weapons that have higher levels of base damage
can have a chance of doing signifigant ammounts of damage to a
vehicle, even under the above rules.

There are generally two schools of thought on how many condition
monitor boxes damage levels such as "Deadly Plus" and above should
fill in.

One school duplicates the 1,3,6,10 progression for the higher levels
of damage, with the higher damage levels doing 11,13,16, and 20
contition monitor boxes worth of damage respectively.

The other school notes that Moderate damage does 2 more boxes worth
than Light, Serious does 3 more boxes than Moderate, Deadly does 4
more boxes than Serious, and follows that trend with higher damage
levels doing 15,21,28, and 36 condition monitor boxes worth of damage.

There should be a discussion about "Deadly Plus" levels of damage in
the old ITribe archives, from mid-January 99, under the subject
"Deadly Damage: A misnomer"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Personal Privacy 6.0.2

iQCVAwUBNuH8jaPbvUVI86rNAQHu5wP/b8mCw7kIGgrBwxcCKCjo5uv40e53gfem
a8nzJI0sRx3eQfpSmZxpZa7P1APd7z0ySsayBnTkLQUQzgkxDXa3wh5eNhfOWft/
G/sfuZoKopnY0O+dhB0m+x8R4+WBBJmQBoAkWGI7hXclodL6IhR8w6kiCRFM0qFQ
TnHKmvqpPDs=ZQ0I
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
-- Paul Gettle, #970 of 1000 (RunnerPaul@*****.com)
PGP Fingerprint, Key ID:0x48F3AACD (RSA 1024, created 98/06/26)
C260 94B3 6722 6A25 63F8 0690 9EA2 3344

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.