Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Logan Graves logan1@*****.intercom.net
Subject: HELPPPPPPPPPPPPPp
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 22:52:04 -0500
In our last episode, Scott Peterson wrote (in HTML & with attachments):

> Hey you got a scanner?
> Want to be know on Talk city as the chummer who squared Scott Away?
> Got the soucrebooks?
> Again were sanctioned by FASA just have to do the work ourselve...


Let me see if I can suss this, chummer:

1) You're (note the apostrophe!) running THE Shadowrun site at TalkCity and you
don't have any SR sourcebooks??!


> And another thing you want copyright infringement look at any site with
> shadowrun graphics and text

2) You're advocating OUR infringing FASA's copyrighted material, due to the fact
that you've seen numerous examples of Shadowrun artwork & text throughout the
web?? FASA's policy on game-related webpages is very clear & concise. (BTW, I
visited your site & noticed that you're not displaying their required
disclaimer, but you seem to have plenty of their copyrighted artwork blatantly
plastered across each page!)


> ...I need your help badley plkease...
> Thhanks in advance...
> ...were sanctioned by FASA at Talk City so nect time befor you twap...
> ...ourselve and if you all read was to reply to ME privatelky...
> ...theres ways arounf things and if your sanctioned then thingds are ok...
> ...research befor you thwap someone of plug thenm with your salavette...
> ...ok stop the flameds go to...

3) I have a difficult time believing that FASA would _knowingly_ grant so-called
"sanctions" to a Shadowrun site created by a seemingly functional illiterate.
Invest in a spellchecker. Sheesh!


--Fenris
______________________________________________________logan1@*****.intercom.net
(>) Six decades old, and I have to put up with toddlers.
I wrote this one myself, whelp.
(>) FastJack

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.