Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Gurth gurth@******.nl
Subject: [OT] .50 cal machinegun rounds (was Re: black talons)
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 1999 19:28:14 +0100
According to GMPax@***.com, at 12:32 on 9 Mar 99, the word on
the street was...

> > Nope. 12.7x99 mm was a development of the German 13 mm "Tank und
Flieger"
> > cartridge, adapted by John M. Browning for an upscaled version of his .30-
> > 06-caliber (7.62x63 mm) M1919 machinegun, intended as aircraft armament
> > and for providing anti-aircraft fire. AFAIK it was never used as an anti-
> > tank round in the US -- probably because to the best of my knowledge, no
> > anti-tank rifle was ever built in the USA around that time.
>
> Not for a rifle: for the .50 Calibr Browning MACHINE GUN.

Please read before replying. Thank you...

> And, at least, the antitank use is what I have heard/seen on PBS/etc.
> :-)

"PBS" being...? (Remember that not all of us on this list are Americans;
IIRC it's some kind of TV station or network, but as I don't get it here
in the Netherlands and so do not know what's on it, it's about as much use
to me as a comment of "I saw it on RTL5" would be to you.)

Anyway, yes, 12.7x99 mm is a machinegun round, like I mentioned in my post
(for which see above); the only use in rifles that I know of dates from
the last 15 years or so, when things like the Barrett 82 and similar
weapons were developed and taken into service.

--
Gurth@******.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
Hoera, we leven nog!
-> NERPS Project Leader * ShadowRN GridSec * Unofficial Shadowrun Guru <-
->The Plastic Warriors Page: http://shadowrun.html.com/plasticwarriors/<-
-> The New Character Mortuary: http://www.electricferret.com/mortuary/ <-

GC3.1: GAT/! d-(dpu) s:- !a>? C+(++)@ U P L E? W(++) N o? K- w+ O V? PS+
PE Y PGP- t(+) 5++ X++ R+++>$ tv+(++) b++@ DI? D+ G(++) e h! !r(---) y?
Incubated into the First Church of the Sqooshy Ball, 21-05-1998

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.