| From: | Stainless Steel Rat ratinox@******.gweep.net |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Viper Errata |
| Date: | 10 Mar 1999 20:19:35 -0500 |
Hash: SHA1
* Iridios <iridios@*********.com> on Wed, 10 Mar 1999
| Interesting point, however are the weights listed for loaded or
| unloaded weapons? Looking at the weight of standard ammo (.5 kg/10
| rds!) I'd say the weapon weights are unloaded...
Then the concealability ratings are also for unloaded weapons. Somehow, I
don't think so.
[...]
| Which implies that they *know* about the debate over the damage code
| and have chosen to leave it as it stands.
All it says is that someone found a disscrepancy between the description of
the weapon and the listed damage code.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v0.9.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE25xongl+vIlSVSNkRAiBSAKCYDLbkkRTH5k/1Gh3kqqrKE/slZQCfbTDn
AAujH7jXR6Gz6QFOjaIdXzk=dNaI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
Rat <ratinox@******.gweep.net> \ Warning: pregnant women, the elderly, and
Minion of Nathan - Nathan says Hi! \ children under 10 should avoid prolonged
PGP Key: at a key server near you! \ exposure to Happy Fun Ball.
