Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: GMPax@***.com GMPax@***.com
Subject: Viper Errata
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 1999 20:07:06 EST
In a message dated 3/12/99 6:42:34 PM Eastern Standard Time, dghost@****.com
writes:

> <SNIP>
> >IIRC FL
> >rounds CANNOT mix with silencers, etc, save in the Viper. Which is it's
> own,
> >specific, special advantage. :-) Silenced FL.
>
> I don't recall this from anywhere.

It only makes logical sense. I do know, guns using FL or shotguns firing
standard shot ammunition, in SR2 at least, could NOT use silencers and sound
suppressors. I'm without my rules for a week (forgot to fetch them from the
University gaming club again, and they have a 1-week break, argh!), but if
someone could check, I think there was mention ...

I concede this may have been a HR that made SO much common sense, I have
fudged it in mymemory into the realm of the official. <g>

Still, think for a moment. Those silencers use a tubular brush arrangement to
contain the gasses and flash of a gunshot, right? Well, a bullet can bull
it's way through the brushing inside the silencer. Think about what would
happen if the bullet was a cluster of fibers, each one no larger (and maybe a
bit smaller!) than any one bristle of those brushes? Got a problem there, the
FL's are going to get caught up inside the silencer.

No wound to your target, AND your silencer is wrecked. Not a desireable
outcome.

By and large, except the Viper, anything using FL ammunition is INCAPABLE of
being silenced; that's why the original question arose on AOL, where I asked
FASA to clear up how hte Viper worked, and presented the "multiple single-
fired large flechette" version as my thought of the ONLY way it could work.
FASA agreed, so, here we are, several DOZEN posts later. :-)

BTW, did you miss GridSec quashing this, mostly? THIS post at least adds
something (it clarifies who said what, in recent terms). <g> Hopefully
enough to keep me safe, eh?

Sean
GM Pax

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.