Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: David Buehrer dbuehrer@******.carl.org
Subject: Alternate Damage Tracks
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 08:00:43 -0700 (MST)
Gurth wrote:
/
/ According to grahamdrew, at 14:20 on 13 Mar 99, the word on
/ the street was...
/
/ > I was leafing through VR 2.0 and I happ4ened upon the "Condition Montor
/ > Table) on page 124. It says that you fill in 1 box for light, 2 for
/ > mod, 3 for serious, and 6 for a deadly. I thought that sounded odd so I
/ > checked a standard condition monitor and that's 1/3/6/10.
/
/ I've always regarded that 1/2/3/6 thing as a typo; there is no mention
/ anywhere (except in the bit you're referring to) that decking would use
/ different wound levels. I'm pretty sure that if it did, it would have been
/ mentioned explicitly in the text near the table on page 124.

On the other hand, it got my mind whirling :)

Thought of an additional way to reflect possible damage for teeny
weapons and big weapons.

Let's call regular weapons which do 1/3/6/10 Class II weapons.

Weapons which really don't do much damage at all could be Class I
weapons which would have a damage track of 1/2/3/4.

And then there are the big Class III weapons which have a damage track
of 2/6/12/20.

Just more of my musings, take em or leave em :)

-David B.
--
"Earn what you have been given."
--
ShadowRN GridSec
The ShadowRN FAQ
http://shadowrun.html.com/hlair/BuildHtmlFAQ.php3?title=ShadowRN&faqlistúqsrn
--
email: dbuehrer@******.carl.org
http://www.geocities.com/TimesSquare/1068/homepage.htm

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.