From:	Paul Gettle RunnerPaul@*****.com
Subject:	Snake Eyes Helmet
Date:	Fri, 19 Mar 1999 10:38:11 -0500

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

At 12:34 AM 3/19/99 -0700, GRANITE wrote:
>Hmm..sounds a little bit like bending the rules a bit to me..but
>there is no good reason this would not work....

It's no more a bending the rules than the rules for the Sentry II gun
system were. I figure that if there's a canon example of a stationary
drone, then this should be kosher too.

>> it to have all the sensors toys: ....... basic radar,.......
>
>This is the main option I would omit..or rather suggest be
>omitted..because I as an EGM would allow this bit quicker that a lot
>of other options..because use of a radar in such close proximitty to
>the brain..should pretty much cook it..or at least cause cancer..

Any drone or vehicle with a Sensor rating of 1 or higher has radar.
How long would it take for radar to "cook" a brain, in your opinion?
We might have a new mode of attack for drones now. Forget the guns,
just land the rotor drone on top of the target's head and radar him.
:)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Personal Privacy 6.0.2

iQCVAwUBNvJvWKPbvUVI86rNAQF5kQP/c9ttunEw2iVikhZ9TtC0npNg0PuRP5QV
QzKVUjM6YQRy1vNMj9hQTDfj5nljVSR7aR5oYU0UYxozqA/WRYHYMJ+M9MyudFus
HXhvUYaSjusy16BoqdZr9IiqsRcN783iyUP9/c0OZlYEgc+NFGrkrC05e/dnRCvv
n8/Yn+n2lCU=GQAP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
-- Paul Gettle, #970 of 1000 (RunnerPaul@*****.com)
PGP Fingerprint, Key ID:0x48F3AACD (RSA 1024, created 98/06/26)
C260 94B3 6722 6A25 63F8 0690 9EA2 3344