Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: dghost@****.com dghost@****.com
Subject: Astral Assensing (different question)
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 1999 06:46:27 -0600
On Wed, 31 Mar 1999 04:53:52 EST Airwasp@***.com writes:
>In a message dated 3/30/1999 7:11:02 PM US Eastern Standard Time,
>Grimlakin@**********.com writes:
<SNIP>
>>Here is a question for you. Lets say you have a physad with the combat
sense
>>ability. Give him a base rateing of 1. Could a sniper get a shot at
the
>>Physad
>>without said fello getting a chance to do a initiative roll aginst him?
<SNIP>

>Okay, Combat Sense, level 1, gives the Adept 1 extra die to Combat Pool,
but
>what is more important is the amount of dice that the Adept gains in for
>making "Surprise" tests, in this case, IMO.
<SNIP>

Except that since when do make surprise tests for assailants that you
don't detect. As I said in another post, the determining factor here is
detection. Now, a Sniper can get a shot off at with a base Target Number
4 (modified due to scope) out to a range of 1 KILOMETER. What are the
chances of spotting a random person, 1 km away who is shooting from
behind some cover (ie, partial cover). I don't know about you, but I'd
say that to me he'd be a fuzzy dot that I wouldn't even notice ... If the
PhysAd can't detect the Sniper (and I wouldn't even roll unless the
character had special senses AND the player specifically said the
character was looking for something in the area the sniper was in ...),
there'd be no surprise test and no Combat Pool vrs the attack.

--
D. Ghost
(aka Pixel)
WARNING: Virus found: Win.com
Disinfect? (Y/N)

___________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com/getjuno.html
or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.