Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Gurth gurth@******.nl
Subject: Mage vs. Samurai as beginning characters using only SR3 books
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 1999 11:33:06 +0200
According to Arcady, at 1:17 on 2 Jul 99, the word on
the street was...

> Using only the following books:
>
> Shadowrun 3rd
> Magic in the Shadows
> Shadowrun Companion
>
> Is a Samurai inherently weaker than a mage?

"Depends" is the best answer I can give you. The reason I say that is
because it depends very much on how well the players know and understand
the rules, and how well they can apply (abuse?) them. Both street sams and
magicians can get all the basic tools of their trade with SR3 alone; MITS
adds options for the magician, but for the most part these cost plenty of
Karma, so for beginning characters it won't make much of a difference. The
Companion is equally use{ful|less} for both.

> Is it possible to build a samurai who is equivalent in power level to mages.

Yes.

> After my ruling against beta and delta ware one player is complaining that I
> am thus making it impossible for a samurai to be equal in power level.
> I disagree but am curious to know if I am alone in that opinion.

If that's what he thinks, he needs to re-read the rules, IMHO. Sure, a
magician can get the same attribtes, skills, and equipment as a sam, _and_
do magic on top of that. But the sam will have all the cyberware that
compensates for the lack of magical ability.

--
Gurth@******.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
E-mails uit het verleden bieden geen garantie voor de toekomst.
-> ShadowRN GridSec * Unofficial Shadowrun Guru <-
->The Plastic Warriors Page: http://shadowrun.html.com/plasticwarriors/<-
-> The New Character Mortuary: http://www.electricferret.com/mortuary/ <-

GC3.1: GAT/! d-(dpu) s:- !a>? C+(++)@ U P L E? W(++) N o? K- w+ O V? PS+
PE Y PGP- t(+) 5++ X++ R+++>$ tv+(++) b++@ DI? D+ G(++) e h! !r(---) y?
Incubated into the First Church of the Sqooshy Ball, 21-05-1998

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.