Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Adam J adamj@*********.html.com
Subject: The Shadowrun Supplemental #10
Date: Sun, 04 Jul 1999 11:21:46 -0600
At 11:38 7/4/99 -0500, Patrick Goodman wrote:
>> Sorry Patrick, but it doesn't look like there's going to be a
>> Word version.
>
>That's unfortunate, since Acrobat is crap for reading things on the screen

Odd. I don't seem to have a problem. Maximize Acrobat. Hit "View -> Fit in
Window". And as I've said, both on my page and in my posting to the list, a
HTML version will be out this week, for on screen viewing.

>and it constantly locks up at around page 4.

In this particular file? Haven't noticed a problem with it or any other PDF
file I've read before. I have -never- had Acrobat Reader, versions 2
through 4, crash on me. Ever.

If I get more reports of this, I'll look into it, but since page 4 is plain
text, with one line graphic, and nothing else, I have very little reason to
believe that it is in any way corrupted or would cause the reader to crash.

> And I'm not certain what he
>means by Word being a cranky program, since I've never had a problem with
>it.

Word cannot do a decent number of the things that Pagemaker can do, not
without a good deal of kludging around. It's also relatively crash-prone,
doesn't use Type1 fonts near as well as Pagemaker, and has a bunch of minor
issues that add up. After doing 9 issues with Word, and one issue with
Pagemaker, I definitely think that Pagemaker is the superior tool for the job.

I'll look into a Pagemaker -> Word/RTF filter, but I'm not promising
anything. I spend quite enough time on the magazine already, and I
obviously put far too much effort into trying to please -everyone-.

And yeah, if this comes off as a bit frustrated and upset, I am.

Adam

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.