Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: NightRain nightrain@***.com.au
Subject: Totems vs Dragons
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 1999 10:34:19 +1000
----- Original Message -----
From: <Ereskanti@***.com>
To: <shadowrn@*********.org>


> > OK. Assuming that there are such things as totems, as opposed to them
just
> > being contrcuts of the imagination, there is not even a remote chance
for
> > the dragon. Totems are defining aspects of magic. They are somewhat
like
> > (though not the same as) gods.
>
> I am SOOOO glad that you are making this kind of comparison. It does
explain
> much about how you view the Totems (and all the other variations in SR).

What do you mean? Why so avid?

> Though under normal circumstances, I would agree with you. However, with
the
> inclusion of MitS...the world of SR (like it should be), isn't nearly so
> black and white on this issue. Another post said it well...it would
entirely
> depend on the circumstances surrounding the death and why and whom and
for
> what, etc....

Yeah, I think I was a bit too black and white. I do have to admit that
there is always the possiblity of things working in an unexpected way,
doubly so when talking about magic. While for the most part a shaman won't
be avenged by his totem, and should never expect to be, it is I guess a
possibility. But such a response could have almost world altering
ramifications.

NightRain.

+--------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Whatever you do, don't vote! |
| It will only encourage them. |
| ============================== |
| http://nightrain.pagehub.com |
| http://earthdawn.pagehub.com |
| email:nightrain@***.com.au |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------+

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.