Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Steadfast laughingman@*******.de
Subject: Targetting with Anchoring
Date: Thu, 08 Jul 1999 02:15:36 +0200
And so it came to happen that Twist0059@***.com wrote in reply to
gurth@******.nl:

> > > But what if there is more than 1 elf. Does the spell allow you to hit
> > > any elf or does it hit any elf. IE. It validates the targets or it
> > > actually chooses one itself. If the latter...would it be random (the
> > > mysteries of magic) or closest target or what?
> >
> > I'd say the closest target, and if two or more are equally far away from
> > the anchoring, I'd determine randomly. Note that I have no particular
> > reason for this, except that it "feels right" to use the closest
target.
>
> Better to Detect Enemy than something generic like Detect Elf. It also
> doesn't require you to pull out the wand, activate it, and then have it
> detect the Elf. What happens is it detects the elf without any help from you
> (hence the reason for the detection spell) and then blasts him/her.

I think you would not have that much fun with that toy as the goody olde
"Detect Enemy" always has the backfire value.
That is if you do not say that the "Detect Enemy" works only for the wand,
that would not be that fruitfull. After all who has a harmfull attitude
towards an elaborate stick? And guess what, I think it would work that way,
but I am maybe wrong, see further down.

> I'd say the first person to step into the detection area would get blasted.

Problem here could be the Line of sight rule. Any detect spells can detect
the object/person it is designed for on a given basis. This includes
through solid objects. That means blocking the line of sight. Even further
what is if you have that wand and have it under your duster? Is that
covered in the rules? I have not yet taken a closer look regarding
Anchoring, maybe I should take me some time for it after all.

--

---> Steadfast
The one, the only.
That is, if you do not count the others.

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.