Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Steadfast laughingman@*******.de
Subject: Drones and Weapon Mounts
Date: Thu, 08 Jul 1999 23:04:29 +0200
And so it came to happen that Gurth wrote in reply to my humble self:
>
> According to Steadfast, at 12:16 on 8 Jul 99, the word on
> the street was...
>
> > A: How far into a building can the Sensors of a Drone/Vehicle actually take
> > data from?
>
> No idea, perhaps Jon has some enlightening data on this? :)
>
<snip question regarding changing of magazines on drones during
Combat>

> The way I see it, a weapon still has the same ammo capacity as it did
> before being mounted on the drone (or other vehicle). If the clip runs
> out, you can't shoot it anymore... A belt-fed weapon is the best thing to
> mount on a drone, IMO.

Yes, but what if you do not have the space? Nearly any flying drone
has not enough body to mount a LMG or higher. So, what is it to do to
convert an assault rifle for belt feed? Is it impossible or is it
doable?

<snip Jam question on same occasion>
> Depends on the kind of jam. If it's a simple dud, I would imagine the
> drone can re-cock the gun and eject the dud (all that takes is some kind
> of servo motor hooked up to the gun's mechanism). If the weapon itself
> breaks down, there is little the drone would be able to do.

I thought the same and told the GM, he said no way although it was a
dud. Annyway this is no complaining area about "Buhu, my GM was real
bad to me tonite, Buah!", so I cut that. But to be fair, he told me
that he thinks that I need a special modofication to the weaponmount
to do this trick. I pointed to the Weapons integration kit, he told me
that that was not it. So that's it, damn. Do anyone think that a
weapon integration kit got a simple servomotor build in for such an
occasion? Please?
;o)

--

---> Steadfast
The one, the only.
That is, if you do not count the others.

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.