Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Sommers sommers@*****.umich.edu
Subject: Thoughts: sourcebook ideas
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 1999 00:06:10 -0400
At 10:37 PM 7/10/99 , Graht wrote:
>Twist0059@***.com wrote:
>
>/I'd like to see a gear book published annually, with new weapons and toys
>for
>/all of the character classes in SR (magicians, riggers, deckers, samurai).
>/Model it off the Ares catalog or some such thing, and have it packaged up as
>/such. Like the first one could be Ares Winter Security Catalog 2061, the
>/next Ares Fall Security Catalog 2061, and such.
>/The magician's sections could be in-line with security combat magicians, as
>/an excuse for a gun-catalog to offer spells and foci and varies
>enchantments.
>/ Or maybe it could be a catalog from a general distributor of all goods?
>/ Would anyone else like to see this?
>
>I'd have to say no. IMO this would turn Shadowrun into a "who's got the
>most toys" game like AD&D or Battletech. Not that I don't like those two
>games :) (I love em). But I like Shadowrun as it is, in terms of the
>amount of equipment available. On the other hand FASA could probably make
>a lot of money with this idea.... <shrug>.

Quite a few times I've read that one of the central themes to Shadowrun is
the rapid pace of technology. Every year electronics shrink 10% as does the
price. New breakthroughs in cyber and biotech are coming out all the time.
Magic over the last 50 years (game time) has changed considerably.

I would think after all of this a book that came out once a year that
updated these things would be a natural. Right now how often do new
computer models come out as opposed to how many new cyberdecks are
introduced. I for one would love a new book that came out every year that
would give us a little glimpse like that.

Sommers
Insert witty quote here.

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.