Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Rand Ratinac docwagon101@*****.com
Subject: [OT] Earthdawn help.
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 1999 20:21:39 -0700 (PDT)
> > >What was that one adventure that had an Earthdawn item in it? I'm
blanking on the name, but the thing looked like a little worm wrapped
around a staff. IIRC there was hardly any bonding cost for that. Of
course, it did drive the wielder mad...
> >
> > Bottled Demon. And I believe the artifict ended up in Denver in
the official plot, after it passed through the runners.
> >
> > Adam
>
>
> SPOILER
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> The power focus in Bottled Demon looked like a human with a wolf's
head clutching a glowing opal orb, didn't it? I don't remember any
snakes.
> As far as where it ended up, didn't the goon (??Bloodwing??) take it
back to Tir Tairngire?
> -Twist

I can't recall the exact appearance, but Twist sounds pretty close - it
was definitely a humanoid.

He's also pretty much right with what happened to the statue, although
he left a few details out. The elf sam (Bloodwing or Blackwing - he's
called Bloodwing through most of Bottled Demon, but he's also known as
Blackwing sometimes and in his return appearance in Dragon Hunt he's
called Blackwing) takes it to his masters in Tir Tairngire - AFTER the
runners have gotten a great feathered serpent to destroy its power.

Also, there was NO bonding cost. On the other hand, as whoever asked
the question in the first place suggested, it did do funky things to
the user's mind.

*Doc' wonders if he could make an evil magical focus which filled the
mind of the wielder with visions of an ugly dancing baby (the
Eeurrgha-Chuckup Baby)...*
==Doc'
(aka Mr. Freaky Big, Super-Dynamic Troll of Tomorrow)

.sig Sauer
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @*****.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.