Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Gurth gurth@******.nl
Subject: Thoughts: sourcebook ideas
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 1999 11:54:25 +0200
According to Michael & Linda Frankl, at 11:34 on 11 Jul 99, the word on
the street was...

> Think of the SOTA angle too. This would provide GM's with some hard gear to
> have players strive for to keep up with the competition. This would help
> take away the nebulous SOTA cost that the players see no real advantage for
> other than being a cash black hole that they pay, but nothing really changes
> on the character sheet.

I've said it before and I'll probably say it again: the SOTA rules are
screwed up. Instead of making new technology better, it degrades the
performance of the old. I understand this was done because otherwise, in a
few years' time we'd all be using rating 200 white noise generators and
carrying 150M heavy pistols, but it still doesn't make much sense when you
really look at it: it means that an older firearm won't kill as well as a
newer one, for example. But I somehow doubt the bullets from an 1899-
vintage bolt action rifle would bounce off my skin because the SOTA in
1999 is much more advanced...

--
Gurth@******.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
Cooking with the devil, frying down in hell.
-> NAGEE Editor * ShadowRN GridSec * Unofficial Shadowrun Guru <-
->The Plastic Warriors Page: http://shadowrun.html.com/plasticwarriors/<-
-> The New Character Mortuary: http://www.electricferret.com/mortuary/ <-

GC3.1: GAT/! d-(dpu) s:- !a>? C+(++)@ U P L E? W(++) N o? K- w+ O V? PS+
PE Y PGP- t(+) 5++ X++ R+++>$ tv+(++) b++@ DI? D+ G(++) e h! !r(---) y?
Incubated into the First Church of the Sqooshy Ball, 21-05-1998

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.