Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: kawaii kawaii@********.org
Subject: Desperate Pathetic Magic Question
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 1999 11:38:38 -0400 (EDT)
On Thu, 15 Jul 1999, Bai Shen wrote:

> > ><<snip...can thermographic vision see through 'Improved
Invisibility>>
> > >However, for my opinion...I agree with you. I play it as Improved
> > >Invisibility works against Vision. (that's a pronounced period btw) Of
> > >course you can still be detected by sound, smell, astral vision, etc...so I
> > >haven't ever had it be a problem.
> > I agree. The spirit of the rule is that illusions like
> > Improved Invisibility are single-sense illusions
> > and that they effect only ONE sense, i.e. sight.
> > They should have the ability to effect mongyboy's
> > street sam's eyes as he has paid essence for
> > them. He should NOT get an edge over magic
> > JUST because he purchased cyberware. By
> > virtue of the argument that he HAS paid essence
> > for the cybereyes with Thermo then they are
> > IMO considered normal vision for the interpretation
> > of the Improved Invisibility spell.
>
> So would that mean he could see through it using Thermo goggles?
>
> Bai Shen
>
>

In theory, no, since those goggles are technically mechanical and Imp
Invis is a physical bending of light, therefore the goggles won't pick the
person up. HOwever, thermo is also technically supposed to see through the
invis spells.. So. In the end, it would be GM's opinion. I personally
would rule it depending on how many success the caster got on his spell
roll. Either base it on the more success, the better hidden you are or use
the # of succ as the TN for a roll by the rating of the equipment.

Ever lovable and always scrappy,
kawaii

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.