Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Lloyd Vance ljvance@*******.edu
Subject: Value and so on....
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 1999 11:50:46
<snip careless judgement and reaction to it>

> You obvioulsy don't know any NRA members, you would relise that we are not
>"trigger happy", if by that term, you mean that we would WANT to shoot
>someone. I've come closer to taking a life in an accident (on job) than I
>care to think about, and I still wake up in a cold sweat. I have every
>intention of allowing a someone in a defensive situation the chance to turn
>and run, unless my life is in clear and present threat, or the lives of
>those I am a gaurdian of. After that, I fully expect to placed on a
>suicide watch for a couple weeks. 99% of the gun owners I know are in the
>same boat, while the rest got to the point while they were in the service
>that a dead body was a dead body.
>CyberRaven

I, while not an NRA member, agree with CR. I don't own guns so that I can
go kill people at any chance I get. I also haven't been doing martial arts
for the past sixteen years so I could beat people up. You have these
things/abilities so that you never have to use them. I own a gun, living
in fear of the day I _have_ to use it. Not _get_ to. I go to the practice
range and put up with the redneck jackasses because I want to be able to
shoot straight when I have to.

I never want to have to hurt someone. I got beat up enough as a kid (which
is why my father signed me up for my first Tae Kwon Do class) to know that
it really hurts physically and mentally to get beaten. I also know what it
does to people to lose someone violently (also my father).

I'm just stacking the deck.

The Hamm
aka Lloyd Vance

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.