| From: | Quindrael D.N.M.vanNederveen@****.warande.ruu.nl |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Value and so on.... |
| Date: | Sat, 17 Jul 1999 16:37:31 +0200 |
>surprise, surprise, have the least regualtions on firearms. Look at the
>most rural counties in America and the most urban ones.
OK, but is it the regulations that make them "better". If you'd put the
same regulations in the urban areas, do you think these would change for
the better?
I admit there was a time where people needed a gun themselves, and maybe in
the rural areas of America the situation that gave rise to this need still
exists. Biut in the cities? Put a lot of the same species together (let's
just call it "too much") and the species will start infighting. Give them
better weapons, and the fighting will be harder. OK, it's a good thing from
Nature's view, Man is regulating himself better in overpopulated areas. But
do you want victims? Even if they are "the other guy"? Yes, yes, I know,
"if he threatens me, that's his fault". But you know what I mean.
Someone else remarked in a post that these days people _will_ kill you more
easily, if even you give them the stuff they want. But isn't that just a
result from "killing someone" becoming more common, exactly because it
happens so often? And because they are afraid that if they go away, you
_still_ might try to grab a gun and go after them?
VrGr David
"Shapes of angels the night casts lie dead but dreaming in my past and
they're here, they want to meet you, they want to play with you, so take
the dream."
(Fields of the Nephilim - "Sumerland (what dreams may come)")
mailto:alamais@***.nl for regular mail
mailto:D.N.M.vanNederveen@****.warande.ruu.nl if your mail has any large
attachments
