Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Gurth gurth@******.nl
Subject: Power (Re: tattoo magic/cyber zombie)
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 1999 11:14:46 +0200
According to Ereskanti@***.com, at 22:33 on 17 Jul 99, the word on
the street was...

> In some games, a cyberzombie might be a thing worth having. In others, no,
> definitely not.

It is largely dependent on the kind of game you want to play, and on
whether the player(s) can handle it, IMO. I have allowed one cyberzombie
to be created as a new character (made as a normal character, costing IIRC
25 points in the Building Point system, and with a number of mandatory
flaws). The character worked okay in the campaign we were playing, though
it came to an end after only two adventures, and I felt the player didn't
do too bad either -- she didn't make the character a combat monster or
semi-Robocop (not even a single cyberlimb, for example) and focused more
on the roleplaying possibilities of a cyberzombie (in this case, overly
paranoid) than the powergaming possibilities.

Under these circumstances, I have no problem with a cyberzombie. OTOH if a
player wants a cyberzombie only to make the most powerful, archetypal
street-sam-without-a-past possible, or if I were GMing a street level
campaign, I'd say "no."

--
Gurth@******.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
Cooking with the devil, frying down in hell.
-> NAGEE Editor * ShadowRN GridSec * Unofficial Shadowrun Guru <-
->The Plastic Warriors Page: http://shadowrun.html.com/plasticwarriors/<-
-> The New Character Mortuary: http://www.electricferret.com/mortuary/ <-

GC3.1: GAT/! d-(dpu) s:- !a>? C+(++)@ U P L E? W(++) N o? K- w+ O V? PS+
PE Y PGP- t(+) 5++ X++ R+++>$ tv+(++) b++@ DI? D+ G(++) e h! !r(---) y?
Incubated into the First Church of the Sqooshy Ball, 21-05-1998

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.