Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Rori Steel cullyn@*****.com.au
Subject: Mundanes
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 1999 14:12:34 +0000 (GMT)
On Wed, 21 Jul 1999 11:13:28 -0500 (CDT), you wrote:
>Maybe its just some kind of latent munchkinous tendency I have but I
>realized that I have a damn hard time coming up with a character that has
>absolutely NO magic and NO cyber. I'm talking about a character like the
>Detective or Tribesman from the SR2 book. More times than I can count I've
>been working on a character and thought "If I add a smartlink . . ." or
>"With physad improved skills . . ." or "With just a couple
spells/spirits
>the character could . . ." Even when I try to make a mundane, uncybered
>character, something always sneaks its way in.
>
>Anyone else have this problem? How many of you people have completely
>non-magical, non-cybered characters?

Ive had a character based on a Tv Series called Good Guy Bad Guy in
Australia.. He was about 30ish, and was an ex private investigator,
who now ran a Laundromat... It was an awesome concept, and gave me a
lot to work with. No magic and no cyber or bio.

The thing i think is how much do you like suprises? How good is your
GM at giving you something out of nothing. If your GM runs wild with
ideas, and loves to give your character(s) direction on where to do,
what you do, and what happens to you... they can take a mundane
character and maybe get you into an accident where you loose your
eyesight, or a leg, or have heart failure, or maybe protect yourself
from a spell without knowing it and bringing you to your totem.. there
is so much room for a GM to move with a non-magical, non cybered
character that its awesome. I suggest you try it :> You may be
suprised at where you end up, and thats one of the things i love most
about roleplaying... :>

Have a great night people!

Cullyn
cullyn@*****.com.au

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.