Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: K. Suderman suderman@*****.ocean.fsu.edu
Subject: wages of sinning...
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 1999 08:49:15 -0400
>
>> Which brings me to my next question: How does a team become (or pass
>> itself off as) an elite team? Or stated another way, How does a team raise
>> its pay scale?
>> I think that street rep would be very important. A team that accomplished
>> its missions in a covert, deniable manner would command higher pay than one
>> that (for example), used ~30 kilos of plastic explosive and two dozen
>> grenades to level two buildings in its first two runs (and even got mug
>> shots on the Midnite News...). [Yes, I am trying to turn terrorists into
>> shadowrunners. Wish me luck...]
>
>I'm not sure that would be the case, exactly. I'd say that the team that
>fulfills the mission best, from the Johnson's perspective, will get a
>better reuptation than a team that does the job but in a way Mr. Johnson
>doesn't really like but can live with, and they in turn will have a better
>reputation than a team that frags up all the time.
>
I see your point. I was thinking of runs as being strictly _covert_ ops,
in which case, the best publicity is no publicity. I realized last nite
(while trying to come up with the sort of run that a Johnson would seek my
team out for) that some runs are very overt. [I think they are about to be
approached by an Italian businessman who wants to send a (rather loud)
message to a competitor...]
So, street rep would be heavily influenced by the Johnson's satisfaction
with the results. Hmmm... do fixers make follow-up calls to the Johnsons?
How corrupt are fixers? (as corrupt as they can afford to be...) Would a
well-placed bribe help the fixer decide who gets the easy jobs? :)

Keith


Keith Suderman suderman@*****.fsu.edu
Florida State University 850-980-3218
Department of Oceanography

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.