Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Kelson kelson13@*******.com
Subject: Missing Ranged Called Shots
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 1999 13:38:12 -0700
Hi all,

I had a player present a question to me the other day that I wasn't able to answer. He
wanted to know how to figure if a called shot hit another part of the body if the called
shot itself missed. His reasoning was that just because you miss the target's
head/arm/whatever doesn't mean you won't still hit the target in another location.

My initial reaction was that while there is a chance of hitting another part of the
target's body, there is a risk to making a called shot. Then I thought about it for a
minute and debated whether it would be too complex to add someting into the system to
account for this.

My first quesion is this: is this a good thing to add into the rules? Is it too much?
After all, sometimes you will miss altogether, but I can see how you might be off just a
little in a direction that would still hit the target.

My thoughts on a system for this would be to figure the called shot modifier last. So, if
a player would normally hit the target if it weren't for the called shot mod, the shot is
considered a hit. But this doesn't account for total misses of the target. After all,
you can still just miss the target because you aimed a teensy weensy bit too far to the
right of your target's right arm and his torso is to the left, or whatever. Also, this
takes away the risk of making a called shot. After all, if you hit without the +4 TN mod
you would still hit the person - gaining the best of both worlds. All shots would be
called shots. *shudder*

Ideas? Comments? Flames?

Thanks!

Justin


--== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==--
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.