Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Airwasp@***.com Airwasp@***.com
Subject: Desperate Pathetic Magic Question
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 1999 09:34:20 EDT
In a message dated 7/27/99 10:47:19 AM US Eastern Standard Time,
morrisjila@*******.com writes:

> As far as I undrestood the essense cost paid for any cyberware made it part
> of the persons body, for example the invisibility spell doens´t works
> against non tecnological devises, but cybereyes are decevede by the
illution
>
> because they now they are a part of the person who owns them.

Okay, my thoughts (and yes, it has been a while since I last sent anything
out at all) ..

Invisibility does not work against technological devices because it only
exists within the person's mind.

A person with a cybereye can still be affected by an invisibility spell as
the spell is mana based.

Here is the kicker then. Some smart-ass decker reprograms his smartlink to
also have a visual component linked to the cybereye. The smartlink
programming is to recognize all objects in the line of sight of the viewer.
The decker choses that the smartlink is to query him on all targets that it
can see. He sets it so that he can turn this option off when he feels safe,
otherwise it is only a simple action for him to acknowledge to the smartlink
that the person is really there.

Now then, some unfortunate soul comes along with invisibility cast on them
happens to go after this decker, and decides to get him from in front of him
... although the decker may not be able to see person due to the spell, the
modified smartlink recognition programming does notice the individual and
does inform the decker that the person is there. When the decker takes a
second to notice if the person is there and sees nothing, then the guy under
the invisibility is in for one frag of a surprise.

What do you guys think?
-Mike B.

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.