Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Arcady arcady@***.net
Subject: British Giant
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 1999 15:55:43 +700
>>>He also has 55 points of Spells and 4 pts of bonded foci. I didn't look
>>>through equipment in-depth, but that's a lot of money for spell pts (like

>>>24 extras, so 600K). He also has no lifestyle, and no vehicles, so
>>>nowhere to store his LMGs and miniguns.
>
>Too many points. Isn't the limit 50?

Hmmm... I didn't catch that but I believe that's correct.

>Make him take the priority system; it'll limit his munchkin options.
>Or do what I do to players who threaten to quit: hand them a bag of
>kitty litter and tell them it's for the next time they wanna use the
>bathroom.

Oh he hasn't threatened to quit. It's more like I'm expecting him to. He's "expressed
his frustration" at my unwillingness to give in. We exchanged about 4 emails
over 2 day earlier this week with my messages being "stick to +/-6 on
edges/flaws"
and his being "Ok, I'm down to X now and that's just Y over 6 and I think I'm
being very reasonable here so you should just give it to me."

Last night after typing his character in and noting a few numbers flaws I pointed
this out and got a reply that read as very exasperated (sp?).

I may try the suggestion of redesigning his character for him and showing my
design. I think I know what 'kind' of person he wants to play. And I honestly
believe there's a non-munchkin concept in there that he just doesn't know how
to de-munchkinize after years of playing a game where-in power is everything
(AD&D) to the average group that plays it.

If he was trying to be a pure munchkin he would have realized how crippling
the Int score will be on some of his magic attempts and how badly the Cha will
hurt his contacts. Maybe. I'm being hopeful here. :)

Looks like I've got a lot of work before tonight's game (in 3 hours). :) And
I still have to do the stats of the 'evil blood cult initiate and his minions
followers'. :)

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.