Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Roger J. An ricker@********.com
Subject: A British Formori (LONG) (RE: A British Giant)
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 1999 12:55:07 -0400 (EDT)
On Thu, 5 Aug 1999, Arcady wrote:

> >You would only see this side of my GMing in extreme cases. The point
>
> I'm at extreme here.
>
> I'm more used to this problem. Which is a large part of the issue. I'm used
> to less combat savy PCs. Of the rest of the party the most munchiny character
> is the physadept since he can do a killing hands (5S) at up to a 5 or 6 meter

> The groups character sheets are at:

Dude!

Half your team has sensitive systems! All it's gonna take is one guy to
get a cold, and the rest of the team will be outta commission! Hahaha.
You're having trouble finding tough enough NPCs to fight them? Have one
cough on them. Like I said before I think the edges and flaws are a
little wacky. The phys ad in your group is a quick healer and has a weak
system? Your Fomori and shaman have sensitive systems too.

Oy. BTW, your phys ad has his points wrong. If you want to use Distance
Strike with Killing Hands you have to double the points for one or the
other. It's in Awakenings under the Distance Strike Description. So he
doesn't have enough of a magic rating for the other powers. That has to
be understood, distance strike is powerful without killing hands. A
starting physical adept can only afford to have distance strike with like
moderate killing hands and that would be it. (Distance Strike or Moderate
Killing Hands Cost having to be doubled)

I don't why you're having trouble in combat. All of them don't have high
initiative. Two sammies with wired 2 could devestate them.

Lates,

Roger

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.