Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Angelkiller 404 angelkiller404@**********.com
Subject: Another Munchin example
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 1999 03:35:49 -0400
>Last night one of my players sent me a character sheet he just
created
>for fun after he read MiTS, although it doesn't seem so much fun to
me.
>
>Basic character/priority choices: A : 1.000.000 Y, B : adept, C : 24
>attribute, D : Dwarf and E : 27 skill. And then it begins:
>essence=1.25 and magic=1, however he still holds adept powers for 6
>powerpoints.
>The reason is that magic loss can be countered by taking a geas and
so
>he has taken the 'exclusive' geas to counter 5 point of magic loss.
Now
>IIRC you cannot take the same geas twice to counter for magic loss,
but
>I don't have my sourcebooks by hand now. Also I don't remember if
you
>are allowed to take any geasa upon character creation?
>
>Any thoughts on this?


Throw a Happy Fun Ball at him (um, disregard that comment, the
caffeine is wearing off). Sure, he can take geasa, but only one at a
time. Period. If he takes exclusive geasa for all of his Powers,
then it only counts as one gaesa (that's just me, though YMMV). This
means, of course, that he can only use one adept power at a time.
That, and geasa only apply to a 25% reduction of adept powers (MitS,
p33, first printing).

IOW, it's a munchkin.

Do all munchkins cheat? I play with a lot of min/maxxers, and I
thought they were the same thing. Apparently not (I should be so
blessed).

-----
AK404

http://mindspring.com/~angelkiller404/
http://gibbed.com/parasiteve/
ICQ: 2157053

"There are hardly any excesses of the most crazed psychopath that
cannot easily be duplicated by a normal kindly family man who just
comes in to work every day and has a job to do."

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.