Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Dvixen dvixen@****.com
Subject: [GridSec] RE: GenCon, GenCon, roly-poly GenCon
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 1999 15:50:57 -0700
At 05:03 PM 10/08/99 , Patrick Goodman and Mark Fender annoyed me by writing:
>> Gosh, you bitch a lot.

>Gosh, you're real friendly. I'm glad we can see eye to eye. I'm glad all the
>Shadowrun supporters are a helpful lot. I'm glad that we had this
>opportunity to share our true feelings with each other.

<GridSec> Go sit in the corner and be quiet. If you can play nice, don't
play at all. No posting from you for a bit.

The only posts I want to see from EITHER of you for the next 48 hours is an
apology for getting personal on the list.

</GridSec>

(I am DEAD serious boys)

>> >> > > The Awakening: the first 50 years - a look back on the sixth
world

> >> > So according to how you look at this, this will either be the FIFTH
> >> > time they've published this or the SECOND.

> >> Huh?

> >Fifth magic book. Second Awakenings book. Depending on your viewpoint.

This book is NOT a magic book at all. It is a book on the history of events
that have occured in various Shadowrun books, all in one place, and in SR3
terms.

>> Huh? I don't know where you're coming up with this, since the title
>> doesn't suggest a magic book at all. It suggests a historical text, maybe
>> that world atlas some of you are so damned keen on.

>Damn. You're attacking other people in a post attack me. That takes balls.
>Congratulations! You're more of a prick than I originally thought.

He WAS correct, but you missed the "the first 50 years - a look back on the
sixth world" part of the title, didn't you?

--
Dvixen - dvixen@********.com - dvixen@****.com
Herkimer's Lair - http://shadowrun.html.com/hlair
"What's your sign?" - "Trespassers will be shot."
Comments/Questions accepted, flames dropped into the abyss.

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.