Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Mockingbird mockingbird@*********.com
Subject: Gun Disposal
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 11:02:52 -0500
----- Original Message -----
From: <Schizi@***.com>
To: <shadowrn@*********.org>
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 1999 10:21 AM
Subject: Re: Gun Disposal


> In a message dated 8/11/99 10:52:02 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
moe@*******.com
> writes:
>
> > > What does polygonal rifling do for the purposes of
identifying
> > > a weapon based on ammo left at the scene? Also, how common is
> > > polygonal rifling?
> > >
> > > Mark
> >
> > Come to think of it, <clueless newbie> what *is* polygonal rifling?
> > </clueles newbie>
>
> Polygonal rifling is mainly in use (today) in Glocks and H&K's. Istead
of
> lands and groves (think of a normal barrel as a circle with channels
cut into
> it) think of the barrel internal as a hexagon. (or other polygon)
> This means the barrels do not have the scratch marks and such to
help ID
> the bullet. This is why Glocks in New York have regualr rifled barrels
as
> opposed to the standard glock barrels, to be able to tel which rounds
were
> the individual cops.
> I think that may have answered it, though I wish I still had the
Glock
> Stocking dealer diagram to illustrate it.
>

This kinda made me start thinking. How hard is it to ID a gun by just
the bullet. I know you can determine if two bullets were shot from the
same gun, but I mean, "The victim was killed by a 9MM. Ballistic says
it looks like it came from a _______."

Mockingbird

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.