Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: GreyWolf sparrow@***.net.au
Subject: [OT] Bull (was [OT] General List Behavior and Attitude
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 1999 12:25:32 +1000
Rand Ratinac wrote:

> <Snipples(TM)>
> > With Cyber and Bio you can go above your 1.5. And Tinner cut me some
> slack, since depending on whether you round up or down, the 1.5 for an
> Ork is 7 or 8. We went with 8.
> >
> > And as for can he go to 12 under SR3... Provided they don;t change
> Bio too much, and assuming your GM lets you round up on the Stat Max...
> Yes :]
> >
> > Bull
>
> Just so we don't get everyone too confused, you DO round up when
> determining attribute maximums. I don't think it was explicitly stated
> in SR2 (probably because there WEREN'T any actual maximums, just
> suggestions), but in SR3 it IS stated. You round up. There's actually a
> table for it, and orks have a maximum intelligence of 8.
>
> Of course, this shouldn't concern the more munchkinous amongst us, as
> they always would have rounded up in any case. :)
>
> Btw, don't y'all go starting in on people whose characters are gonna be
> stuffed by the new cyber/bio rules and callin' 'em all munchies. I've
> got a little lady who I'm gonna have trouble with - and she sure as
> hell ain't munched. Hell, she's only got 3 points of cyber. But she's
> gonna pop under the new rules because she does have a bunch of bioware.
> And that really irritates me, because she's such a great concept, but
> unless they seriously lower the essence "cost" of bioware in M&M, she
> just can't be done anymore. And that sux.
>
> Oh well. Me gettin' OT. Me no rant no more.
>
> *Doc' goes and sulks in the corner...*

I sympathise. I know a certain rigger who is going to go out in a blaze of
gory (spelling intended) when the M&M book comes out.

<sigh>

GreyWolf


--
"I don't know, Scotty. Maybe it's just the _idea_ of an inflatable
rubber starship that bothers me."

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.