From:	leisnj48@****.cis.uwosh.edu leisnj48@****.cis.uwosh.edu
Subject:	M&M conversion( was Re: SR Future Products and Such)
Date:	Fri, 13 Aug 1999 15:44:07 -0600 (CST)

On Wed, 11 Aug 1999 Ereskanti@***.com wrote:

> In a message dated 8/10/1999 11:51:52 PM US Eastern Standard Time,
> Schizi@***.com writes:
>
> >
> > Which brings me to the subject;
> > Any idea on what suggestions were made for converting? or was it simply
> > "well, change the equipment and deal with the results"?
>
> Actually, for a couple of us who saw the draft, I would say the last line
> isn't going to be likely. M&M is probably going to be cleaner and more
> "efficient" and "understandable", but it is also going to have
several
> "munchkinproof" installments as well...

*claps at munchkinproof for a moment* How munchkin proof? Nearly
total-munchkin proof, or just enough so that you really have to work at
being a munchkin?

<sidenote>
If you think about it, RPGers are all munchkins. You're sitting there, in
your game, surrounded by bad guys, and you try coming up with the most
inventive solutions you can to survive and triumph.

And thus, we're all quasi-munchkins, trying to swing the rules and
situations our ways to come out alive and on top.
</sidenote>

> -K (who knows that word is going to cause more frothing, but when it comes
> out, people will understand)

*nods at that* For as long as I can remember, the word 'K' has held a deep
spiritual meaning for me, as I suspect it does for all of us.


-Jared

*smile* Yes, that was a joke...sorry.