From: | Twist0059@***.com Twist0059@***.com |
---|---|
Subject: | SR Future Products and Such |
Date: | Sun, 15 Aug 1999 21:42:07 EDT |
darrell@******.dhr.state.nc.us writes:
>
> > You seem mistaken about the nature of the chat. Arguing doesn't mean
> > fighting, it means point and counter-point. I told him I felt the
> > atmosphere of SR was being stripped out in the new products, he
countered,
> > and round we went, arguing just what the point of Shadowrun should be and
> > the nature of shadowrunners. It wasn't a waste of time, and I didn't
spur
> > him on to it, we were honestly debating the nature of shadowrunners and
> > what should be reflected in the sourcebooks.
>
> So Twist, let me get this straight,... you were trying to tell the
> Shadowrun Line Developer what the game he develops should
> be like? Errr,... okaaaaayyy. :-)
>
>
I was a player voicing my opinion, not telling him what to do. What's wrong
with that?
-Twist