Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Twist0059@***.com Twist0059@***.com
Subject: Wait and see. (Was SR Narrowing of focus)
Date: Sun, 15 Aug 1999 23:17:08 EDT
In a message dated 8/15/99 11:04:44 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
bluewizard@*****.com writes:

> >The problem is this case isn't supported under current sourcebooks. Now
> they
> >are just about ways to commit better crimes, as I've said earlier. A
> bunch
> >of shadowruns isn't interesting at all. It's just a generic series of
> >crimes. Shadowruns based off the rich Shadowrun political/social system
> >makes for good roleplaying. But there is no such current sourcebook
> >material.
>
> New Seattle doesn't support this? No.
> Corp Download doesn't support this? Nope.
> MitS doesn't support this? Only the three pages at the start.
> Threats doesn't support this? Nope.

One's a place book that just offers plot hooks, not a true look at the life
in the sprawl. The next is another series of plot hooks for corps, no
lifestyle info. The next is a rulebook with only a few pages at the start
for atmosphere. And the last is a series of rumors for shadowrunners, not
life in Shadowrun.
>
> Especially Threats. Threats was all about getting "The Truth" out to those
> who need it.
> It even managed to get some useful game material into play for KSAF - a
trid
> company ... kinda like Shadowbeat!
> If Shadowbeat had been as useful overall as the KSAF chapter in Threats,
> we'd probably have seen more of that kind of thing.


Threats especially offered no lifestyle atmosphere of Shadowrun. Except
maybe Tutor, as a view of the wierd junk that can come out of astral space
and affect pretty much anyone (even those not involved in shadowrunning).





-Twist

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.