Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Twist0059@***.com Twist0059@***.com
Subject: Wait and see. (Was SR Narrowing of focus)
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 21:50:34 EDT
In a message dated 8/17/99 5:24:18 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
bluewizard@*****.com writes:

> >> Given a choice though, I think the general target audience for SR would
> >> choose a Target book over a Neo-A book nine time out of ten, and the
> sales
> >> prove me out so far.
> >>
> >Well, NAGRL did come out in 1992. And NAGNA in 1990. Shadowrun's
audience
> >has grown a tad since then.
>
> You're right, the core group has gotten larger.
> However I meant to refer to the demographics of said group.
> SR's target audience is white males, aged 16-25 or so.
> Yes, I know there's plenty of other types of players out there, but this is
> the GENERAL demographic.
> IMO that demographic doesn't give a flying wodewose about the misnamed
> Neo-Anarchists, daily life in the 2060's etc.
> In GENERAL, these players want to participate in a game about runners, and
> making runs.
> If they do downtime/real life stuff at all, most of them will either
> bluebook it, handle it "off panel", or make up their own background
anyway.
>
> Steven A. Tinner


That's a nice argument, but you said up above that the Target books would be
chosen over a Neo-A book nine times out of ten and that the *sales* so far
agree with you. This kind of thing is directly affected by the number of
audience members a particular game has. With a substantially larger gamer
base, any given book released is likely to out-sell a much older edition that
is now OOP. How many people were playing SR in 1990 or 1992? How many are
playing SR currently in 1999?





-Twist

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.