Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Damian Robinson max.robinson@**.net.au
Subject: Minimum strength requirements for firearms
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 1999 09:25:15 +1000
"Paul J. Adam" wrote:
>
> In article <l03130300b3e08c693ab8@[134.100.43.195]>, Till K
> <till_k@***.net> writes
> >I think that´s a bit harsh. Only the strongest humans (Strength 6)
> >could fire a heavy pistol without having to risk being knocked down.
>
> The "what _is_ a heavy pistol?" argument comes around regularly, and >
it's often claimed that a "heavy pistol" is a .44 Magnum or
> thereabouts.

:-{>
A .40 or .45 IMHO, but that's neither here nor there. If anyone is
actually interested, I've got my opinions on weapon power in a .txt
file already.

> I have no problems, based on that, with a 2 x Strength modifier.
> That much momentum is _not_ easily absorbed... 3x suggests a "heavy
> pistol" is a 9mm or so, which a surprising number of "ordinary
> people" still find unpleasantly sharp to shoot.

How about making Body part of the equation then. how about Body +
Strength x 1.5. That way you only need a Bod & Str of 3 to fire a
heavy pistol without a problem.

>
> >This would
> >not be realistic. Even an average person can fire such a weapon
> >without being knocked down.
>
> Uh... no :)When .357 Magnum first appeared, in a long-barreled,
> heavy- framed revolver, S&W felt the need to warn that it was only
> suitable for shooters of large stature, due to its considerable
> recoil...

But we don't see such warnings now for real heavy pistols, like the
.454 Cassul (And that is a heavy pistol any way you look at it!), or
see anyone falling down from firing it either.

I also think the warning was more advertising hype than a real
problem. It was "The Most Powerful Handgun In the World!" According to
S&W, and it was at that time. I own the basically same model they were
talking about, the Model 28 Highway Patrolman, and have fired it with
full power loads, without knockback. I'm not overly strong, but I do
have a higher Bod.
--
Cheers
Damian & Leigh-anne

Home Page:
http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Dreamworld/4808/

ICQ?
His #14030875
Hers #37896626

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.