Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Mockingbird mockingbird@*********.com
Subject: Geasa, who needs 'em?
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 1999 10:44:26 -0500
----- Original Message -----
From: Hunter <griffinhq@****.com>
To: <shadowrn@*********.org>
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 1999 4:44 AM
Subject: Geasa, who needs 'em?


> I was flipping through MitS this morning and I came across the rules
for
> Geasa and Initiation again.
> p. 58 Shedding Geasa
> "Each time a character undergoes intiation (increases his grade), he
can
> get rid of a geas. (p. 33) If the character sheds a geas, he does
not
> gain a new Magic Point for that grade but elimates a geas on one of
his
> existing Magic Points (in other words, the character regains the Magic
> Point the geas was offsetting). A character can shed only one geas
per
> grade."
>
> My question is this: If a magician only gains one Magic Point by
> initiating to shed a geas, then why wouldn't you just ignore geas all
> together and simply just initiate to gain a metamagic technique? In
both
> cases, you get a Magic Point. It makes use of geasa actually make the
> magician weaker in the long run.
>
Hi,
Although you are correct that it would seem better to ignore the
geas and take the point and a technique, it is only better if you have
lost a single point due to magic. Each point you "restore" with a gease
means another gease you must follow. Break one and you loose ALL magic
"restored" by taking gease. Take a smartlink, get a gease, initiate,
take the point and technique, loose a point of magic to a deadly wound,
take another gease, break either and your down 2 magic points.

Mockingbird
--who hopes that makes sense to anyone else

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.