Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Starrngr@***.com Starrngr@***.com
Subject: Lone Star SWAT-FRT(was Re: SR Narrowing of focus)
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 1999 00:35:04 EDT
In a message dated 8/19/99 11:45:51 AM Pacific Daylight Time, John writes:

> > That it was...However, I have to wonder WHERE Nigel Findley got most of
> > that stuff. ESPECIALLY for SWAT/FRT. Seemed odd LS would fund *2* units
> > doing what seem to be the SAME things. I always go by the rule: This is
> *LS
> > ONLY*. KE and others are more sane. Also...on the numbers and roles: I
> > gotta admit, some of the stuff for that seems odd: why WOULDN'T SWAT
> > cross-train? I mean, they do IRL (so says a local SWAT officer. Joy for
> > public-friendly medium-sized town cops.:>). Otherwise, it's great.
Mostly.
> > (I mean, we won't MENTION the Ruger Thunderbolt, arguably one of the most
> > munchkin-attractive weaps: a BURST-FIRE Heavy Pistol???? Jesus.)

Basicly, There could be a good reason. They DONT do exactly the same
things. FRT could be a FAST response team, for one. Get support to the Cop
on the beat as fast as possible, going for lighter weapons and armor in favor
of speed of response. SWAT, with its special weapons and Tactics would then
have heavier weapons and armor, and would be the ones called on when the cops
spot that tank (sorry, I mean the rigger's highly modified armored land
vehicle) parked at a warehouse. They show up with Mil grade armor, Anti Tank
rockets, etc....

I do, however, love the thought of turning LS's SWAT into TANK POLICE. Heh.
Heh. Heh.

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.