Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Gurth gurth@******.nl
Subject: Sourcebook issue
Date: Sun, 22 Aug 1999 11:41:33 +0200
According to Schizi@***.com, at 21:15 on 21 Aug 99, the word on
the street was...

> I would like some pictures also, though of course many people feel it is a
> waste of space and money (gotta pay for them pics :-)

"I found that a weapon I couldn't visualize rarely if ever showed up in my
games."
-- from the intro to the "Ultramodern Firearms" sourcebook for
Millennium's End.

I've found I agree with that; pictures of equipment help you very much in
actually getting the item used in the game. Much more equipment from the
SSC gets used in my games than from the SR3 main book, where similar items
exist in both books, anyway (there's not much alternative for a white
noise generator, for example). If you ask me, it's because the SSC has
pictures, so players can see their characters carrying around the items,
while a "faceless" item from SR3 is much harder to picture in their
characters' hands.

> I liked the layout in Cybertechnology, with ore than one item per
> picture/page.

Absolutely. The size of the pictures in the SSC (and FoF) could have been
much smaller, and still give a good impression of what each item is like.
Three or four items per page should have been easily possible, even with
all the pictures.

--
Gurth@******.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
De plaag is terug...!
-> NAGEE Editor * ShadowRN GridSec * Unofficial Shadowrun Guru <-
->The Plastic Warriors Page: http://shadowrun.html.com/plasticwarriors/<-
-> The New Character Mortuary: http://www.electricferret.com/mortuary/ <-

GC3.1: GAT/! d-(dpu) s:- !a>? C+(++)@ U P L E? W(++) N o? K- w+ O V? PS+
PE Y PGP- t(+) 5++ X++ R+++>$ tv+(++) b++@ DI? D+ G(++) e h! !r(---) y?
Incubated into the First Church of the Sqooshy Ball, 21-05-1998

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.