Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Gurth gurth@******.nl
Subject: Question: Multiple Datajacks
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 20:57:45 +0200
According to JRCrandall@***.com, at 13:45 on 24 Aug 99, the word on
the street was...

> I just switched from SR2 to SR3 and noticed that some of the sample
> characters have multiple datajacks. Other than a note in the datajack
> description that says that the practice is not uncommon, I find no real
> reason for this to be done. Can someone tell me what I'm missing??

In a lot of cases, there is hardly any point in getting more than one
datajack. There are only two cases where more than one is useful, it seems
to me:
1) when you want to jack into multiple things at once -- a remote control
deck and a rigger-modified vehicle, for example, or a cyberdeck and a
computer; or
2) When you want to be a rigger/decker combo (see Rigger 2, where it
explains how rigger jacks differ from decker jacks).

Most of the time, though, you should be able to do just about anything you
want with only a single datajack. I used to have a rigger character with
two datajacks, but after I while I swapped one for a softlink, simply
because I never used both.

--
Gurth@******.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
De plaag is terug...!
-> NAGEE Editor * ShadowRN GridSec * Unofficial Shadowrun Guru <-
->The Plastic Warriors Page: http://shadowrun.html.com/plasticwarriors/<-
-> The New Character Mortuary: http://www.electricferret.com/mortuary/ <-

GC3.1: GAT/! d-(dpu) s:- !a>? C+(++)@ U P L E? W(++) N o? K- w+ O V? PS+
PE Y PGP- t(+) 5++ X++ R+++>$ tv+(++) b++@ DI? D+ G(++) e h! !r(---) y?
Incubated into the First Church of the Sqooshy Ball, 21-05-1998

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.