Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Wildfire Wildfire@*************.com
Subject: Getting Nasty to Your Players (WAS: Re: The Friggin' Healing Spell)
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 14:06:56 -0400
Arcady wrote:

> >> I consider it very poor GMing to take action against a character because of
>
> >> a dispute with a player. It's a non forgivable breech of conduct. Likewise
> when
> >> it's one player using their character to go after another player's character
>
> >> because of a real life issue.
> >>
> >> Resolve your real life issues out of game.
> >
> >> I also consider rape to be a taboo subject I will not use nor will I
tolerate
>
> >> a game that uses it 'on screen'. It's just very bad form and very poor taste
>
> >> as it can tread way too close some people's real world issues.
> >
> >....but doesn't this just contradict the above statement?
>
> No. It's saying don't push past people's boundaries.
>
> >Now, this is not the first time that I have seen people that are against
> >rape in a RP context, and while I understand the emotional traumatic
> >impact it may have on some people, Shadowrun is not a happy shining world.
>
> >Rape, murder, organlegging, slavery, it all happens and happens pretty
> >damn often.
>
> But we don't need to get sick and depraved in our entertainment.
>
> >If people choose to play a dark cyberpunk world such as SR, they should be
>
> >aware of that and accept what comes their way.
>
> No. Playing a game in a dark universe does not give the other people one plays
> with the free license to abuse you emotionally.
>
> Arcady Resume: http://resumes.dice.com/arcady <0){{{{><
> Art: http://elfwood.lysator.liu.se/lothlorien/artists/brianfw/brianfw.html
> /.)\ Projects: http://www.geocities.com/TimesSquare/Portal/1865/
> \(@/ Homepage: http://www.jps.net/arcady/

Didn't we just go through all this and decide to disagree? If I wanted to hear it
again, I could go read the archives...

Wildfire

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.