Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Iridios iridios@*********.com
Subject: Questions of great importance (Steve, Jon, RA:S people especially)
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 1999 08:42:10 -0400
Rand Ratinac wrote:

> Btw, if black sucks so hard, why do people insist on using it? Or is
> that a Hollywood fallacy?

It is more likely the average persons (including movie producers)
perception that black things are hard to see in the dark. This is
partly true, a black stationary object is very hard to see in the
dark; but a black spot that is moving is easier to pick out due to
it's obstruction of background images (stars, streetlights, reflected
light, etc). I once read an article by a Vietnam veteran, that
captured VC soldiers admitted that they tracked US soldiers by looking
for the "black sticks" (M16s/M14s) that moved through the jungles.

The purpose of camoflague is to break up a pattern enough to "hide"
it's wearer. Anytime you are moving, it is less effective.


--
Iridios
"Accept what you cannot avoid,
Avoid what you cannot accept."

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.