| From: | Rand Ratinac docwagon101@*****.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Questions of great importance (Steve, Jon, RA:S people especially) |
| Date: | Thu, 2 Sep 1999 19:17:33 -0700 (PDT) |
Arcology be considered under combat conditions (and thus be wearing
urban cammo), or standard conditions (with woodland cammo fatigues)?
>
> Well, considering that people have been killed, many of them just
UCAS citizens, I'd say it would qualify as a "HOSTILE" situation to me.
;-P
> -K (who isn't going to mention the activated gun turrets or missile
deployments systems right now... )
That's nice - but none of these guys ever go into - or even
particularly close - to the arc. That's Red Samurai turf.
And wouldn't it make sense for the army to try to keep an illusion of a
semblance of a tad of a milligram of normality? :) In which case they'd
be using woodland cammo fatigues, right?
==Doc'
(aka Mr. Freaky Big, Super-Dynamic Troll of Tomorrow)
.sig Sauer
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com
