Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Ereskanti@***.com Ereskanti@***.com
Subject: Ruthenium (Re: Questions of great importance)
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 1999 23:01:38 EDT
In a message dated 9/2/1999 9:36:00 PM US Eastern Standard Time,
docwagon101@*****.com writes:

> > > Whats the refresh rate on Ruthenium?
> >
> > FAST!!! And something tells me its' going to be even FASTER in
> upcoming materials down the road (we've advanced the SR SOTA Curve,
> this only makes sense)...
>
> Can you give me more than vague hints here, K?

Not really.

> > WHY is Ruthenium going to have a reducing effect upon *ANY* kind of
> armor. If anything, I see armor that has been hit (especially by HE
> rounds, Acid, etc...) as having *ITS* effectiveness reduced.
> >
> > I just don't like the way they've pointed the rules out as they stand
> here. Its' used for flexible screens/trids, etc...I don't understand
> the problem.
> > -K (okay, I'm confused, I admit it)
>
> Good question. I for one certainly can't answer it. But the rule stuffs
> me up pretty good. :) Now, I think I'm going to have to take some
> "artistic license" and ignore the armour-reduction of the polymer - or
> I'll have them wearing standard armour, with a ruthenium "suit" over
> the top of that. Is that allowed in the rules?

I know that we've used it for some time now actually. There is one character
and a drone (anthroform) that use the concept all the time. Both of them
ordered a larger than size for them type of "rain parka/slicker" with a
hood/mask of sorts. The character wears his armor jacket/shin guards
underneath it as they go along. Sure, he's a bit warm, but for *many*
targets, he's vanished anyway.

The drone is a bit more complicated but functions along the same principle.

-k

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.