From:	Bruce gyro@********.co.za
Subject:	Ruthenium Cloaks (Re: Questions of great importance)
Date:	Tue, 7 Sep 1999 16:40:27 +0200

From: IronRaven <cyberraven@********.net>
Date: 07 September 1999 04:28
Subject: Re: Ruthenium Cloaks

>>>> Have you considered giving them those "spetznaz" style
>>You'll have to ask Kevin about this one. I believe the Afghani
>
> Never heard of them. I'm suspecting that is probably a form of
>camoflauge, possibly a form of ghille (it can be spelled with a "y"
if you
>are French, but that is the only place I've seen it spelled that way)
>equipment.

Arclight posted the stats I mentioned earlier today... Thanks mate :)

> I doubt it would be body armour, simply becuase even things like
Tawaron
>(fairly new stuff, much stronger than Kevlar) are heavy. I own a
cape with
>light weights (4x5g) at the hem, and it may be fine for around town
(in the
>middle ages or at Halloween), it would get hung up too easy in brush
or
>operationally. I would wan't one that weighed a couple kilos hanging
off
>of me and being loose, no thanks. I'll take a poncho with
conventional
>body armour.

In the conditions we are talking about ('raku's arc) they might work
quite well.
I would go for +1 Impact +1 Ballsitic with the cloaking effect being
more
effective the less the cloaked individual moves...

Doc, I'm sure you can work on something there...

- + - BRUCE <gyro@********.co.za> -

MiX it UP!