From: | Bruce gyro@********.co.za |
---|---|
Subject: | SR2 v. SR3 [was: Re: Deciper press release link] |
Date: | Thu, 9 Sep 1999 11:49:21 +0200 |
To: shadowrn@*********.org <shadowrn@*********.org>
Date: 09 September 1999 06:55
Subject: SR2 v. SR3 [was: Re: Deciper press release link]
>So, why is SR3 better than SR2? Why was it necessary? And what isn't
better?
>What's worse? I'd like to hear people's opinions.
>
>And, since I don't often ask for other people's opinions on
anything--I've
>got plenty of my own, thanks very much--break out a bottle of
Champagne on
>me.
Well, we have a new initative system that some people like ( I do ),
Matric rules from VR2 and rules from Rigger 2 in the main book, better
art for the sample characters, a better magic system (esp. since
MitS), a better character creation system, with the priorities more
balanced, knowledge skills, more gear and toys brught in from older
books etc etc etc...
You want my opinion? A better game overall, and a great buy. I believe
the latest printings even have the errata fixed up and everything :)
Just read a friends copy and see
- + - BRUCE <gyro@********.co.za> -
MiX it UP!