| From: | Mike & Linda Frankl mlfrankl@***.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | SR2 v. SR3 [was: Re: Deciper press release link] |
| Date: | Thu, 9 Sep 1999 17:27:49 -0400 |
> So, why is SR3 better than SR2? Why was it necessary? And what
> isn't better?
> What's worse? I'd like to hear people's opinions.
>
> And, since I don't often ask for other people's opinions on anything--I've
> got plenty of my own, thanks very much--break out a bottle of Champagne on
> me.
Personally I like the new flexible spell power levels and the revised
version of spell locks. I prefer the new initiative system (allows some of
the slower players to do stuff sooner in a way) along with the new (old?)
dodge test system (sometimes it's better to try and dodge or just try and
shrug it). I also like the fact that Adepts are a little faster.
Some points off the cuff. As a whole I did like the change to SR3.
;)
Smilin' Jack (who is hoping M&M isn't going to totally screw up Street Sams)
