Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: IronRaven cyberraven@********.net
Subject: Questions of great importance (Steve, Jon, RA:S people
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 1999 17:13:23 -0400
At 15.16 09-10-99 -0500, you wrote:
>So I guess the whole "honor" diatribe you went on a few weeks back was just
>a scam too, eh?

No, it was not. If you wear the uniform of my enemy, and your forces fire
on my forces' medics, I will have no reservations about shooting yours. If
you respect our medics, I will return the courtisy (does that have an "e"
in it?). Even if you don't, I won't shoot at medievac shoppers and
ambulances, unless they are firing (a guy clinging to the side with a rilfe
doesn't count), and never at hospitals
To me, being a medic is not the same as being an uninvolved party, just
like a water truck. If it is an in-field support (non-combat) unit, and
ours are being purposely targeted, I will return the favor. IF you choose
to be an univolved party, that's fine. However, I know too many medics
(USAF PJs and an Army SF medic) who (a) can "out medic" a line medic, (b)
out fight grunts, and are loaded for bear when they take the field, and
EMTs who joined the Marines or Army becuase they were tired of picking up
hurt kids, to consider them to be a "non-threat".
I know that sounds confusing. Basically, it depends on the medic, who
they work for, and what they are doing. If they are being a good little
corpsman, and carrying nothing more than a sidearm and some smoke, and just
trying to help peole, fine. You carry the red cross and a rifle, you
become a probable target. You fire that rifle at me or my forces, and you
are a target.



Kevin Dole, aka CyberRaven, aka IronRaven, aka Steel Tengu
http://members.xoom.com/iron_raven/
"Once again, we have spat in the face of Death and his second cousin,
Dismemberment."
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in
your philosophy."

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.