Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Scott W iscottw@*****.nb.ca
Subject: SRIII meets its steely doom.
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 1999 16:43:09 -0300
"And now, a Channel 6 editorial reply to Ereskanti@***.com."
] <snip very large reply and commentary>
]
] > -Boondocker
]
] I just wanted to take this opportunity to say, "that" was the best reply to
] the SRII vs. SRIII post that I've seen yet. Not in terms of material or
] content, but in terms of Intent and "non-abbrasive" approach.
]
] <rounds of applause>

Thanks :)
I've been new (I still am, I guess; I don't think anyone would say
I'm a regular). Way back when, I logged on to #shadowrun, and whined a
bit about Canadian funds, the price of SR3, what was changed, should I
buy it, yadda yadda. I was dealt with in a very polite manner, and I'm
thankful for it. So when this fellow posted his query about SR3, I
replied, ignoring the fact that the subject matter irritated me, in the
hope that I'd answer the question as fully as I could, and thus stop
the topic before it got out of hand. Oh well :)
As for non-abrasiveness...here's how I write mail: I press "Reply,"
and say exactly what I want to say, foul-mouthed and no-holds-barred.
Then I delete it, and write a tamer, but still sarcastic message. Then
I delete _that_, take a deep breath, and try to be tactful. If that
doesn't work, I cancel the message (on good days; sometimes nasty stuff
still escapes, after all, I'm human). It works for me :)

Geez. Now this sounds very holier-than-thou. Take my word that it's
not meant that way :) I just don't want this list to go the way of
some others I've been on...it's too good a list to lose.

-Boondocker

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.